Key Legal Considerations to Obtain Indigenous Crayfish Quota Allocations in WA

Key Legal Considerations to Obtain Indigenous Crayfish Quota Allocations in WA

by | 12 Sep 2025

Introduction

Western Rock Lobster is Australia’s most valuable fishery, generating over $400 million annually. For Indigenous communities, crayfish is not just a commercial product — it is part of cultural heritage and diet. Yet many communities are effectively locked out of the fishery due to high entry costs and tight quota systems.

This raises the question: what legal considerations apply to Indigenous crayfish quota allocations in WA?

Legal Foundations

  • Akiba v Commonwealth (2013) confirmed that native title includes commercial fishing rights.
  • WA fisheries law allows for quota allocation and leasing, but the system is highly competitive.
  • Indigenous communities have lobbied for dedicated allocations, citing cultural and economic exclusion.

The Challenges

  • Quota Scarcity: The WA rock lobster fishery is fully allocated.
  • High Costs: Licence and quota units sell for millions, pricing out Indigenous groups.
  • Regulatory Barriers: Approvals are complex, requiring compliance with biosecurity and sustainability rules.

Legal Pathways for Indigenous Access

  • Government Allocation: Advocating for a fixed Indigenous quota share (e.g., 1–2% of TAC).
  • Quota Leasing: Leasing pots or units from licence holders.
  • Joint Ventures: Partnering with established operators to build skills and share profits.
  • Policy Reform: Engaging with ministers to develop Indigenous-specific licensing streams.

Key Contract Considerations

When Indigenous groups lease quota or form JVs, contracts must cover:

  • Catch entitlements and how profits are distributed
  • Compliance responsibilities, including reporting and gear limits
  • Termination rights if obligations are breached
  • Transparent benefit-sharing to avoid internal disputes

Risks to Manage

  • Misclassification of Indigenous rights as “cultural only,” excluding commercial potential.
  • Breaches of compliance rules that risk suspension of licences.
  • Governance disputes within Indigenous corporations over revenue and benefit distribution.

The Way Forward

  • Governments should commit to Indigenous quota allocations in high-value fisheries like rock lobster.
  • Industry should embrace joint ventures and sharefishing models.
  • Indigenous corporations should strengthen governance and compliance capacity.

Conclusion

Indigenous communities in WA deserve fair access to the rock lobster industry. The law already recognises their commercial rights — now policy and practice must catch up. With clear contracts, fair quota allocations, and strong governance, Indigenous crayfish fishing can flourish as both a cultural right and a commercial opportunity.

Grow your business with updates straight to your inbox!

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Next Steps: Sync an Email Add-On

To get the most out of your form, we suggest that you sync this form with an email add-on. To learn more about your email add-on options, visit the following page (https://www.gravityforms.com/the-8-best-email-plugins-for-wordpress-in-2020/). Important: Delete this tip before you publish the form.

Send Us a Message

More From the Blog

Wild Catch – What Legal Issues Matter?

Wild Catch – What Legal Issues Matter?

Introduction Wild catch fishing has always been at the heart of Australia’s seafood industry. From barramundi in the north to rock lobster in the west and abalone in the south, commercial fishers supply both local tables and global markets. The industry is worth...

read more